A Computational Analysis of Oral Argument in the Supreme Court

34 Pages Posted: 8 Oct 2019 Last revised: 29 Mar 2021

Date Written: July 3, 2019

Abstract

As the most public component of the Supreme Court’s decision-making process, oral argument receives an out-sized share of attention in the popular media. Despite its prominence, however, the basic function and operation of oral argument as an institution remains poorly understood, as political scientists and legal scholars continue to debate even the most fundamental questions about its role.

Past study of oral argument has tended to focus on discrete, quantifiable attributes of oral argument, such as the number of questions asked to each advocate, the party of the Justices’ appointing president, or the ideological implications of the case on appeal. Such studies allow broad generalizations about oral argument and judicial decision making: Justices tend to vote in accordance with their ideological preferences, and they tend to ask more questions when they are skeptical of a party’s position. But they tell us little about the actual goings on at oral argument—the running dialog between Justice and advocate that is the heart of the institution.

This Article fills that void, using machine learning techniques to, for the first time, construct predictive models of judicial decision making based not on oral argument’s superficial features or on factors external to oral argument, such as where the case falls on a liberal-conservative spectrum, but on the actual content of the oral argument itself—the Justices’ questions to each side. The resultant models offer an important new window into aspects of oral argument that have long resisted empirical study, including the Justices’ individual questioning styles, how each expresses skepticism, and which of the Justices’ questions are most central to oral argument dialog.

Keywords: judicial decision making, machine learning, oral argument

JEL Classification: K4, K41

Suggested Citation

Dickinson, Gregory M., A Computational Analysis of Oral Argument in the Supreme Court (July 3, 2019). 28 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 449 (2019), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3198401

Gregory M. Dickinson (Contact Author)

Stanford Law School ( email )

559 Nathan Abbott Way
CA 94305
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
97
Abstract Views
617
rank
320,924
PlumX Metrics