Breach of Contract: A Plea for Clarity and Discipline

32 Pages Posted: 19 Jun 2018  

Neil H. Andrews

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law

Date Written: June 1, 2018

Abstract

The author identifies an `anti-termination’ bias in the judicial classification of terms (and in some legislative intervention). The problems engendered by this bias are, first, a weakening of the innocent party’s protection in the face of breach; weakening of commercial discipline overall in the fulfilment of contractual undertakings; and the inability to advise with confidence on whether breach in particular instances will permit, or has permitted, a party to terminate the contract for breach. As the author concludes, the anti-termination bias is a denial of “bright-line” protection of the innocent party and it promotes an overall slackening of discipline by failing to insist on strict compliance with contractual obligations.

Keywords: Contractual breach, innominate term, conditions, certainty

Suggested Citation

Andrews, Neil H., Breach of Contract: A Plea for Clarity and Discipline (June 1, 2018). (2018) 134 LQR 117-137. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3198563 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3198563

Neil H. Andrews (Contact Author)

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law ( email )

10 West Road
Cambridge, CB3 9DZ
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
69
rank
312,895
Abstract Views
149
PlumX