Clash of Norms: Judicial Leniency on Defendant Birthdays

29 Pages Posted: 27 Jun 2018 Last revised: 19 Apr 2019

See all articles by Daniel L. Chen

Daniel L. Chen

Directeur de Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse School of Economics, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, University of Toulouse Capitole, Toulouse, France

Arnaud Philippe

University of Toulouse 1 - Toulouse School of Economics (TSE)

Date Written: March 31, 2019

Abstract

We document judicial leniency on defendant birthdays across 5 million decisions. French sentences are 1% fewer and 3% shorter. U.S. federal sentences are 33% shorter in the day component of sentences (the month component remains unaffected). New Orleans sentences are 15% shorter overall. No leniency appears on the days before or after a defendant’s birthday. Federal judges using deterrence language in opinions, are unaffected, isolating the judicial as opposed to defendant channel. The effect is doubled when judge and defendant share the same race. Our courtroom setting rules out many models of social preferences with reciprocity motives.

Suggested Citation

Chen, Daniel L. and Philippe, Arnaud, Clash of Norms: Judicial Leniency on Defendant Birthdays (March 31, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3203624 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3203624

Daniel L. Chen (Contact Author)

Directeur de Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse School of Economics, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, University of Toulouse Capitole, Toulouse, France ( email )

21 allée de Brienne
31015 Toulouse cedex 6 France
Toulouse, 31015
France

Arnaud Philippe

University of Toulouse 1 - Toulouse School of Economics (TSE) ( email )

Place Anatole-France
Toulouse Cedex, F-31042
France

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
14
Abstract Views
236
PlumX Metrics