Agreeing to Disagree: Diversity, Political Contractualism, and the Open Society

31 Pages Posted: 21 Jul 2018

Date Written: June 30, 2018

Abstract

Political contractualism is important in societies characterized by substantial moral and political disagreement and diversity. The very disagreement that makes the social contract necessary, however, also makes agreement difficult. Call this the paradox of diversity, which is the result of a tension between two necessary conditions of political contractualism: existence and stability. The first involves showing the possibility of some agreement, while the second involves showing that the agreement can persist. To solve both of these problems, I develop a multi-level contract theory that I call the “open society” model of political contractualism that incorporates diversity into the contractual model at different stages solving the existence problem, while avoiding fragility in the face of the stability problem. This approach, I argue is able to take advantage of the benefits of institutional diversity while providing a stable framework for productive political disagreement.

Keywords: Political Contractualism, Diversity, Stability, Open Society, Social Contract

Suggested Citation

Thrasher, John, Agreeing to Disagree: Diversity, Political Contractualism, and the Open Society (June 30, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3206144 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3206144

John Thrasher (Contact Author)

Chapman University ( email )

Orange, CA 92866
United States
7146287343 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
23
Abstract Views
91
PlumX Metrics