The Case of the Religious Gay Blood Donor

50 Pages Posted: 10 Jul 2018 Last revised: 28 May 2021

See all articles by Brian Soucek

Brian Soucek

University of California, Davis - School of Law

Date Written: July 2, 2018


The Food and Drug Administration prohibits sexually active gay men from donating blood. This essay envisions an original legal challenge to that rule: not the predictable equal protection suit, but a religious freedom claim brought by a gay man who wants to give blood as an act of charity. Because the FDA’s regulations substantially burden his exercise of religion—requiring a year of celibacy as its price—the FDA would be forced to show that its policy is the least restrictive means of preventing HIV transmission through the blood supply. Developments in testing technology and the experience of other countries suggest that this would be hard to prove.

A lawsuit like this would either produce a major victory for gay rights or, as likely, would force courts to clarify and curtail some of the most controversial aspects of recent, mostly conservative, religious freedom efforts: their expansive view of religious burdens and their willingness to impose costs on the government or other third parties. In other words, by appropriating legal arguments from the right, a lawsuit like this presents a win-win proposition for progressive litigators. This essay considers why mainstream gay rights organizations may nonetheless shy away from bringing it.

Keywords: RFRA, gay rights, FDA, blood donations, LGBT rights, religious freedom, religious exemptions, equal protection, MSM

Suggested Citation

Soucek, Brian, The Case of the Religious Gay Blood Donor (July 2, 2018). 60 William & Mary Law Review 1893 (2019), Available at SSRN:

Brian Soucek (Contact Author)

University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )

400 Mrak Hall Dr
Davis, CA CA 95616
United States


Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics