Shooting for the Stars: An Analysis of the Morningstar Ratings

24 Pages Posted: 26 Jul 2018 Last revised: 29 Apr 2020

See all articles by Ravi Sastry

Ravi Sastry

University of Melbourne - Department of Finance

Date Written: April 29, 2020

Abstract

Morningstar ratings are important determinants of fund flows. We derive the finite-sample distribution of the underlying Morningstar risk-adjusted return (MRAR) and show that it exhibits high variance and bias. High variance explains the observed low absolute persistence of Morningstar ratings. The bias is increasing in fund volatility, perversely rewarding funds for taking on risk. This explains why 1-star ratings are more persistent than 5-star ratings. These theoretical findings are confirmed in a bootstrap analysis of the joint empirical distribution of mutual fund returns. Lastly, as an expected utility measure, the MRAR is meaningful at the portfolio-level but not the fund-level.

Keywords: MRAR, MPPM, mutual funds, hedge funds, ranks

JEL Classification: C58, G11, G23

Suggested Citation

Sastry, Ravi, Shooting for the Stars: An Analysis of the Morningstar Ratings (April 29, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3209119 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3209119

Ravi Sastry (Contact Author)

University of Melbourne - Department of Finance ( email )

Level 12
198 Berkeley Street
Victoria 3010
Australia

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
88
Abstract Views
882
rank
353,019
PlumX Metrics