Picking Spinach

8 Pages Posted: 26 Jul 2018 Last revised: 12 Oct 2018

See all articles by Anthony Michael Kreis

Anthony Michael Kreis

Georgia State University - College of Law

Date Written: July 6, 2018

Abstract

Law journals are the spinach of academic life — a healthy part of the legal academic’s diet but too often insufferably boring to consume. Despite being ridiculed as too lengthy, too footnote-heavy, and too arcane, the production of these traditional academic articles remains the primary vehicle for law professors to expand human knowledge. In more practical terms, law review articles are key in hiring, promotion, and tenure decisions. Given the importance of the law review article to legal academics, scholars from outside disciplines are often shocked to learn that law journal editors are students, that articles are not blind or peer reviewed, that publication offers from “lower ranked” journals can be used as leverage for placement in “better” journals, and that there is no discipline-wide accepted metric for journal quality. Legal academics understand law journals’ deficiencies all too well, but down the hatch they go.

The law journal submission process is seriously flawed. This essay briefly examines the law review submission process and offers small reforms so the process better reflects the commonly held conventions about journal quality while minimizing artificial barriers to entry.

Suggested Citation

Kreis, Anthony Michael, Picking Spinach (July 6, 2018). Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3209349

Anthony Michael Kreis (Contact Author)

Georgia State University - College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 4037
Atlanta, GA 30302-4037
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
125
Abstract Views
1,055
rank
253,948
PlumX Metrics