Are the Largest Banking Organizations Operationally More Risky?
Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, forthcoming
65 Pages Posted: 29 Jul 2018 Last revised: 28 Mar 2022
There are 2 versions of this paper
Are the Largest Banking Organizations Operationally More Risky?
Are the Largest Banking Organizations Operationally More Risky?
Date Written: November 10, 2021
Abstract
This study demonstrates that, among large U.S. bank holding companies (BHCs), the largest ones are exposed to more operational risk. Specifically, they have higher operational losses per dollar of total assets, a result largely driven by the BHCs’ failure to meet professional obligations to clients and/or faulty product design. Operational risk at the largest institutions is also found to: (i) be persistent, (ii) have a counter-cyclical component (higher losses occur during economic downturns), and (iii) materialize through more frequent tail-risk events. We illustrate three plausible channels linking BHC size and operational risk – institutional complexity, moral hazard incentives arising from “too-big-to-fail” and innovation. Our findings have important implications for large banking organization performance, risk, and supervision.
Keywords: banking organizations, size, operational risk, tail risk, recessions
JEL Classification: G20, G21
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation