IRS Guidance – Rulemaking and Deference to IRS Statutory Interpretation

115 Pages Posted: 2 Aug 2018

See all articles by John A. Townsend

John A. Townsend

University of Houston School of Law; John A. Townsend, Attorney

Date Written: July 27, 2018

Abstract

This article deals with one of the key intersections of federal tax law and administrative law: IRS rulemaking. The IRS makes rules that affect the public through regulations and subregulatory guidance. I first discuss the IRS process for issuing such guidance and the principal forms the IRS uses. I then discuss the administrative law concept of deference to agency statutory interpretations. In administrative law, the two key regimes for deference are Chevron deference and Skidmore deference. Chevron deference requires the court to defer to an agency interpretation in formal guidance when the statutory text being interpreted is ambiguous and the agency interpretation is a reasonable interpretation even though the court believes there is a more reasonable interpretation. In the IRS context, Chevron deference applies to Treasury Regulations. Skidmore deference requires the court to defer to an agency interpretation in subregulatory guidance to the extent that the interpretation is persuasive. (That Skidmore formulation may sound a bit odd, but I get into that in the article.)
The nonmainstream discussion in the article has two interrelated components: First, Chevron does not apply to legislative regulations. Legislative regulations are regulations, exemplified in the tax area by the consolidated return regulations under § 1502, where Congress delegated to the IRS the power to make the law. Second, Chevron does apply to interpretive regulations--regulations which interpret the statutory text. Some authors assert that, if Chevron deference applies to give the interpretation the force of law, then the regulation is a legislative regulation with the APA requirements for legislative regulations--promulgation in the Federal Register and prospective application only. The same argument, presumably, would apply if Skidmore or any other deference is given to an IRS interpretation in subregulatory guidance, because by conferring deference the interpretation has the force of law. I disagree with those authors. I assert that a court adopting--deferring to, if you will--an agency interpretation of ambiguous statutory text does not transform interpretation into legislative rulemaking under the APA. Hence, for such agency interpretations promulgation in the Federal Register is not required and the interpretations can apply retroactively. The IRS usually does issue its formal interpretations in regulations subject to notice and comment, so that is not a key difference. But, IRS interpretive regulations can and often do have retroactive effect.

Keywords: APA, Rulemaking, IRS, Regulations, Subregulatory

JEL Classification: K23, K34

Suggested Citation

Townsend, John A., IRS Guidance – Rulemaking and Deference to IRS Statutory Interpretation (July 27, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3212060 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3212060

John A. Townsend (Contact Author)

University of Houston School of Law ( email )

Houston, TX 77204
United States
713-521-9977 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.tjtaxlaw.com

John A. Townsend, Attorney ( email )

2340 Albans Road
Houston, TX 77005
United States
(713) 521-9977 (Phone)
(713) 521-7713 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.tjtaxlaw.com/

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
134
rank
202,192
Abstract Views
384
PlumX Metrics