Higher Minimum Quality Standards and Redistributive Effects on Consumer Welfare

Marketing Science, 39(1): 253-280, 2020

67 Pages Posted: 4 Aug 2018 Last revised: 1 Apr 2020

See all articles by Marco J.W. Kotschedoff

Marco J.W. Kotschedoff

KU Leuven

Max J. Pachali

Tilburg University - Tilburg University School of Economics and Management

Abstract

This paper estimates an individual level demand model for eggs differentiated by animal welfare. Typically, after minimum quality standards for eggs are raised, the price of higher quality eggs falls. As a result, consumer welfare is redistributed from households who do not value animal welfare to households who are willing to pay a premium for animal welfare. In our analysis of German household data, we find that on average, households with higher income are willing to pay more for eggs that provide higher animal welfare. This provides evidence that higher minimum quality standards have a regressive impact. In counter-factual scenarios, we estimate the cost reduction that would be needed to offset the regressive effect, and find that as retailers’ pricing power increases, the cost reduction must be higher. Finally, we consider hypothetical future scenarios that continue to increase the minimum quality standard until only the highest quality eggs remain on the market.

Keywords: Minimum Quality Standard, Product Differentiation, Regulation, Consumer Harm, Bayesian Estimation, Heterogeneity

JEL Classification: L11, L13, L50, H23

Suggested Citation

Kotschedoff, Marco J.W. and Pachali, Max J., Higher Minimum Quality Standards and Redistributive Effects on Consumer Welfare. Marketing Science, 39(1): 253-280, 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3214249 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3214249

Marco J.W. Kotschedoff

KU Leuven ( email )

Naamsestraat 69
Leuven, B-3000
Belgium

Max J. Pachali (Contact Author)

Tilburg University - Tilburg University School of Economics and Management ( email )

P.O. Box 90153
Tilburg, 5000 LE
Netherlands

HOME PAGE: http://sites.google.com/site/mjpachali/

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
211
Abstract Views
1,597
Rank
248,134
PlumX Metrics