Criminal Procedure Rights and Harmless Error: A Response to Professor Epps

17 Pages Posted: 7 Aug 2018 Last revised: 17 Oct 2018

See all articles by John Greabe

John Greabe

University of New Hampshire School of Law

Date Written: October 4, 2018

Abstract

The harmless error doctrine is beset with problems, both theoretical and practical. In Harmless Error and Substantial Rights, recently published in the Harvard Law Review, Professor Daniel Epps proposes a reconceptualization of constitutional criminal procedure rights that is designed to address these problems. Epps argues that those constitutional criminal procedure rights that are capable of being violated by prosecutors and judges in nonharmful ways should be redefined to include a require- ment that their violation causes the right holder harm. In other words, what we now regard as a nonharmful violation of a constitutional crimi- nal procedure right would not amount to a constitutional violation at all.

This Response argues that, while harmless error doctrine should indeed be reformed, acceptance of Epps’s proposal would create more problems than it would solve. Specifically, the narrower constitutional precedent that would result from implementing the proposal would cause mischief when translated into other adjudicatory and lawmaking con- texts. The Response thus defends the conventional understanding of harmless error review as a remedial inquiry. It does so by summarizing Epps’s argument, laying out concerns about certain transcontexual e ects if it were to be accepted, and proposing some alternative pathways to reform.

Suggested Citation

Greabe, John, Criminal Procedure Rights and Harmless Error: A Response to Professor Epps (October 4, 2018). 118 Columbia Law Review Online 118 (2018), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3215461

John Greabe (Contact Author)

University of New Hampshire School of Law ( email )

Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
United States
(603) 513-5191 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
24
Abstract Views
228
PlumX Metrics