Download This PaperNeither Democratic Nor Constitutional But Legitimate: Fragmentation and the Legitimation of International Law
27 Pages Posted: 7 Aug 2018
Date Written: July 17, 2018
Abstract
In this paper, I draw on the work of Luhmann and Teubner to develop an alternative model of legal pluralism in international law. I argue that this model is more suitable to critical theory than the traditional monist account adopted by Habermas.
Keywords: Critical Theory; Public International Law
JEL Classification: K33
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Gray, Kevin W., Neither Democratic Nor Constitutional But Legitimate: Fragmentation and the Legitimation of International Law (July 17, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3215640 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3215640
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN