Bankruptcy Claims Trading

15 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 772-99

UC Hastings Research Paper No. 297

53 Pages Posted: 1 Aug 2018 Last revised: 17 Nov 2018

See all articles by Jared A. Ellias

Jared A. Ellias

University of California, Hastings

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: July 22, 2018

Abstract

A robust secondary market has emerged over the past twenty years in the debt of Chapter 11 firms. Critics worry that the trading associated with this market has undermined bankruptcy governance, by forcing managers to negotiate with shifting groups of activist investors in the Chapter 11 bargaining process. This paper investigates whether this is a common problem and concludes that it is not. Although trading of bond debt is pervasive, the activist groups that tend to participate in negotiations usually enter cases early and rarely change significantly. Trading in general, therefore, does not appear to have the impact on governance that many claims trading critics fear, at least insofar as the average case is concerned.

Keywords: bankruptcy; claims trading; Chapter 11; corporate restructuring

JEL Classification: G23, G30, G33

Suggested Citation

Ellias, Jared A., Bankruptcy Claims Trading (July 22, 2018). 15 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 772-99; UC Hastings Research Paper No. 297. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3215701 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3215701

Jared A. Ellias (Contact Author)

University of California, Hastings ( email )

200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
222
rank
130,076
Abstract Views
810
PlumX Metrics