The Appellate Body in Dire Straits: Taking a Step Back on Consent to Jurisdiction

19 Pages Posted: 26 Jul 2018 Last revised: 1 Mar 2019

See all articles by Clément Marquet

Clément Marquet

University of Geneva - Department of Public International Law

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: December 1, 2018

Abstract

The WTO is facing difficult times as the renewal of the members of its Appellate Body seems to be in a deadlock. The opposition of some Members of the Organization to the process means the number of adjudicators is slowly dwindling. In this paper, we put this problem in context, by linking it to the greater concerns about consent in international adjudication. Consent amounts to the effective transfer of adjudicative power to a given tribunal. It is therefore argued that the non-renewal of AB members amounts to a withdrawal of consent by the parties concerned, be it legal or not. Should the problem persist, the WTO's dispute settlement system could be profoundly impacted, transforming it into a mere conciliatory body.

Keywords: WTO, world trade organization, dispute settlement, consent, appellate body, panel, withdrawal, DSS, AB, DSB, dispute settlement body, jurisdiction, international trade, DSU, obligation to consent

Suggested Citation

Marquet, Clément, The Appellate Body in Dire Straits: Taking a Step Back on Consent to Jurisdiction (December 1, 2018). Society of International Economic Law (SIEL), Sixth Biennial Global Conference (2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3220525 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3220525

Clément Marquet (Contact Author)

University of Geneva - Department of Public International Law ( email )

Geneva
Switzerland

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
97
Abstract Views
449
rank
179,799
PlumX Metrics