New Tech v. New Deal: Fintech As A Systemic Phenomenon

59 Pages Posted: 1 Aug 2018 Last revised: 15 Oct 2018

Date Written: July 30, 2018

Abstract

Fintech is the hottest topic in finance today. Recent advances in cryptography, data analytics, and artificial intelligence are visibly “disrupting” traditional methods of delivering financial services and conducting financial transactions. Less visibly, fintech is also changing the way we think about finance: The rise of fintech is gradually recasting our collective understanding of the financial system as simply another sphere of normatively neutral information technology and objective computer science. By making financial transactions faster, cheaper, and more easily accessible, fintech seems to promise a micro-level “win-win” solution to the financial system’s many ills.

This Article challenges such narratives and presents an alternative account of fintech as a systemic, macro-level phenomenon. Grounding the analysis of evolving fintech trends in a broader institutional context, the Article exposes the normative and political significance of the current fintech moment. It argues that the arrival of fintech enables a potentially decisive shift in the underlying public-private balance of powers, competencies, and roles in the financial system.

In developing this argument, the Article makes three principal scholarly contributions. First, it introduces the concept of the New Deal settlement in finance: a fundamental political arrangement, in force for nearly a century, pursuant to which profit-seeking private actors retain control over allocating capital and generating financial risks, while the sovereign public bears responsibility for maintaining systemic financial stability. Second, the Article advances a novel conceptual framework for understanding the deep-seated financial dynamics that have eroded the New Deal settlement in recent decades. In particular, it offers a working taxonomy of principal mechanisms that both (a) enable private market actors to continuously synthesize tradable financial assets and scale up trading activities, and (b) undermine the public’s ability to manage the resulting system-wide risks. Finally, the Article shows how and why specific fintech applications – cryptocurrencies, distributed ledger technologies, digital crowdfunding, and robo-advising – are poised to amplify the effect of these destabilizing mechanisms, and thus potentially exacerbate the tensions and imbalances in today’s financial markets and the broader economy. It is this potential that renders fintech a public policy challenge of the highest order.

Keywords: fintech,fintech regulation,financial regulation,fintech charter,financial stability,systemic risk,blockchain,bitcoin,cryptocurrency,financial innovation,ICO,smart contract,robo-advising,crowdfunding,crypto asset,New Deal,Treasury report,financial markets,secondary market trading,regulatory arbitrage

Suggested Citation

Omarova, Saule T., New Tech v. New Deal: Fintech As A Systemic Phenomenon (July 30, 2018). Yale Journal on Regulation, Vol. 36, Issue 2 (2019, Forthcoming); Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18-39. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3224393 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3224393

Saule T. Omarova (Contact Author)

Cornell University - Law School ( email )

Myron Taylor Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853-4901
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
680
rank
34,819
Abstract Views
1,709
PlumX Metrics