Testing a Beckerian-Arrowian Model of Political Orientation Discrimination on the U.S. Law Professor Labor Market: Measuring the 'Rank Gap,' 2001-2010

42 Pages Posted: 23 Aug 2018

See all articles by James Cleith Phillips

James Cleith Phillips

Stanford University - Constitutional Law Center

Date Written: August 1, 2018

Abstract

There are comparatively few conservative and libertarian law professors on U.S. law school faculties. Why is this? One possible explanation is discrimination based on political orientation. This paper tests this using a model of discrimination based on the work of Nobel Prize-winning economists Gary Becker and Kenneth Arrow in order to measure the “rank gap” — the difference in the ranking of a hiring law school based on one’s political orientation after controlling for other predictors of that ranking (clerkships, publications, the law school one graduated from, etc.). The paper, using matching statistical methods, finds that upon comparing conservative/libertarian law professors hired from 2001-2010 with equally-credentialed liberal law professors, conservatives/libertarians end up, on average, at a law school ranked 12-13 spots lower (i.e., less prestigious). (See pages 36-37.) This rank gap is not uniform, being more moderate with the top 75 schools, non-existent with schools 76-100, and the largest with the lowest-ranked schools. (See page 40.) The paper finds a similar “rank gap” for law professors whose political orientation was unknown or moderate compared to their liberal peers. Thus, while there may be other mechanisms causing the dearth of conservative/libertarian law professors in the legal academy, those who do make it in the door appear to experience discrimination based on political orientation. The paper also discusses the harms that a lack of conservative/libertarian law professors causes. Namely, legal scholarship suffers from an echo chamber; law students, particularly liberal ones, may not sufficiently learn how to make or counter conservative and libertarian arguments; and law and policy is not as strong as it could be without conservative/libertarian critiques and perspectives. (See part I.A, pages 5-11.)

Keywords: discrimination, law school, law professor, politics, ideology

JEL Classification: J71

Suggested Citation

Phillips, James Cleith, Testing a Beckerian-Arrowian Model of Political Orientation Discrimination on the U.S. Law Professor Labor Market: Measuring the 'Rank Gap,' 2001-2010 (August 1, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3224508 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3224508

James Cleith Phillips (Contact Author)

Stanford University - Constitutional Law Center ( email )

559 Nathan Abbot Way
Stanford, CA 94305
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://law.stanford.edu/directory/james-phillips/

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
433
rank
61,618
Abstract Views
4,235
PlumX