Twenty Years of Intermediary Immunity: The US Experience

14:1 SCRIPTed 5 (2017)

32 Pages Posted: 17 Aug 2018 Last revised: 25 May 2019

See all articles by Jeff Kosseff

Jeff Kosseff

United States Naval Academy, Cyber Science Department

Date Written: June 1, 2017

Abstract

Policymakers worldwide have long debated how to maintain free expression on the Internet while minimising defamation and other harmful online speech. Key to these debates has been intermediary liability: whether online platforms should be held legally responsible for user-generated content. To inform this continued debate, this article examines the US experience with relatively broad intermediary liability immunity. Enacted two decades ago, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 provides robust immunity to websites, Internet service providers, social media providers, and other online platforms for legal claims arising from user content. This article examines the scope of the immunity that Section 230 provides to US platforms and examines the primary criticisms of this approach. This article analyses court opinions involving Section 230, and examines the content moderation policies and practices of the leading US online platforms. The article concludes that Section 230 has fostered the growth of social media, user reviews, and other online services that rely primarily on user-generated content. Critics of Section 230 raise valid concerns that the broad immunity often prevents lawsuits against online platforms. However, my research concludes that many of the largest US intermediaries voluntarily block objectionable and harmful content due to consumer and market demands.

Suggested Citation

Kosseff, Jeff, Twenty Years of Intermediary Immunity: The US Experience (June 1, 2017). 14:1 SCRIPTed 5 (2017), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3225773

Jeff Kosseff (Contact Author)

United States Naval Academy, Cyber Science Department ( email )

121 Blake Road
Annapolis, MD 21402
United States

HOME PAGE: http://jeffkosseff.com

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
194
Abstract Views
657
Rank
468,510
PlumX Metrics