Captive Insurance Company Premium Loan Backs: Proper Investment or Improper Return of Capital?

Captive Visions, 2015

3 Pages Posted: 18 Aug 2018

See all articles by Beckett Cantley

Beckett Cantley

Northeastern University

Bruce Luna

Atlanta's John Marshall Law School

Date Written: July 1, 2015

Abstract

Over the last decade, the use of Captive Insurance Companies ("CIC") has expanded from large entities to smaller, closely held companies when utilize the IRC 831(b) election. Correspondingly, the IRS has expanded its review of CIC arrangements, specifically targeting those CIC arrangements that utilize the IRC 831(b) elections for tax shelter reasons. To date, the vast bulk of IRS audits have focussed on the type of insurance provided by a CIC to its insured. In the future, additional IRS investigations may focus on the final transactions between the CIC and its respective owner, specifically circular cash flows created by premium loan backs from the CIC to the CIC owner.

Suggested Citation

Cantley, Beckett and Luna, Bruce, Captive Insurance Company Premium Loan Backs: Proper Investment or Improper Return of Capital? (July 1, 2015). Captive Visions, 2015, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3226456

Beckett Cantley (Contact Author)

Northeastern University ( email )

31 Fox Lake Circle
Santa Rosa Beach, FL FL 32459
United States
702-881-4849 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.cantleydietrich.com

Bruce Luna

Atlanta's John Marshall Law School ( email )

1422 W. Peachtree Street, N.W.
Atlanta, GA 30309
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
26
Abstract Views
341
PlumX Metrics