Diluting Prejudice

37 Pages Posted: 18 Aug 2018

See all articles by David John Harvey

David John Harvey

University of Auckland; District Court of Auckland

Date Written: August 4, 2018


This paper is about the steps that may be taken to dilute but not totally eliminate the prejudicial effect of on-line material that relates to a defendant about to stand trial. It is posited upon the fact that jurors, despite strong judicial directions, will go on-line to seek out information relevant to the case that they are trying. The solution lies in the use of what could be described as “take-down” orders whereby material is removed from websites during the course of the trial to eliminate or dilute any prejudice that may otherwise arise, along with de-indexing the reference in search engines. The remedy of a “take-down” order restores the qualities of practical and partial obscurity of prejudicial information that was a characteristic of the pre-Digital Paradigm. The paper also discusses the issue of juror contempt in light of proposed changes to the law in the Administration of Justice (Reform of Contempt) Bill.

Keywords: Juries, Criminal Jury Trial, Googling Jurors, Take Down Orders

JEL Classification: K

Suggested Citation

Harvey, David John, Diluting Prejudice (August 4, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3226631 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3226631

David John Harvey (Contact Author)

University of Auckland ( email )

Auckland, 1010
New Zealand

District Court of Auckland ( email )

65-69 Albert Street
Auckland, 1010
New Zealand

Register to save articles to
your library


Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics