Capitalism Crowding out Fertility

Proceedings of the 10th International RAIS Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities organized by Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies (RAIS) at The Erdman Center at Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States, pp. 138-141. Cambridge, MA: The Scientific Press.

4 Pages Posted: 22 Aug 2018 Last revised: 19 Oct 2018

See all articles by Julia M. Puaschunder

Julia M. Puaschunder

Columbia University; International University of Monaco (IUM); Harvard University; The Situationist Project on Law and Mind Sciences

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: August 13, 2018

Abstract

The theoretical part starts with an outline of alternative capitalism theories and view of fertility as cause of overpopulation and under-reproduction. The paper then covers the existing literature on a vast array of crowding out factors influencing fertility around the world, featuring hardly any reference to economic variables. It is then innovatively argued that capitalism and access to markets as well as attention to participate in production and consumption curbs people’s humane-imbued wish for parenthood. A worldwide data sample on capitalism measured by the Index of Economic Freedom is portrayed to be negatively correlated with fertility rates around the world. Tariffs and taxation are associated with higher fertility rates. Based on a 139 country strong worldwide dataset on industrialization as measured by the UNIDO in the Industrialization Intensity Index of 2014 and fertility rates as reported by the CIA World Factbook, a highly significantly negative correlation is found between industrialization and fertility rates around the world. Urban areas have lower fertility rates than metropolitan centers and access to markets as measured by the World Bank Rural Access Index is associated with lower fertility rates. This effect also holds for a 50 U.S. states dataset of the 2017 Economic Freedom Index, which reveals economic freedom to be negatively associated with fertility rates in the United States of America. The historical cases of the transition of communist USSR to the more capitalist contemporary Russia as well as the East and West Germany reunification as introduction of East Germany to capital markets; but also the Czech Republic’s gaining access to economic markets and the Islamic state Westernization of Iran in the 1990ies are meta-analyzed in order to reveal that access to markets crowds out fertility over time in different parts of the world. In the historic cases, education, on the contrary, is not related to fertility in a stringent way and therefore argued to just be a vehicle to engage in the economic game of producing and consuming; but the actual driving effect being access to capitalist markets. Practical recommendations are targeted at limiting the downsides of international aid creating overpopulation by shifting to opening markets for overpopulated areas and enabling fertility alongside strengthening the intergenerational glue in under-reproduced areas of the world. The paper concludes with policy recommendations how to implement capitalism in overpopulated-low capitalistic territories and enhance fertility in under-reproduced-high capitalistic countries by curbing capitalism and funding parenthood, which is prospected to become more precious in the digital age.

Keywords: Business Freedom, Capitalism, Capitalism-Fertility Index, Economic Freedom Index, Falling Rate of Fertility, Fertility, Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Index of Economic Freedom, Industrialization Intensity Index, Overpopulation, Rural Access Index, Under-Reproduction, Urbanization

Suggested Citation

Puaschunder, Julia M., Capitalism Crowding out Fertility (August 13, 2018). Proceedings of the 10th International RAIS Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities organized by Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies (RAIS) at The Erdman Center at Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States, pp. 138-141. Cambridge, MA: The Scientific Press., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3230177 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3230177

Julia M. Puaschunder (Contact Author)

Columbia University ( email )

3022 Broadway
New York, NY 10027
United States

International University of Monaco (IUM) ( email )

2 Av Prince Hereditaire Albert
Stade Louis II/B
Monaco, Monaco MC-98000
United States

Harvard University ( email )

24 Oxford Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

The Situationist Project on Law and Mind Sciences ( email )

24 Oxford Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
189
Abstract Views
1,641
Rank
243,817
PlumX Metrics