Is the 'Sell in May and Go Away' Adage the Result of an Election-Year Effect?

Managerial Finance, v 44, 2018; DOI (10.1108/MF-12-2017-0505)

Posted: 26 Aug 2018

See all articles by Doug Waggle

Doug Waggle

University of West Florida

Pankaj Agrrawal

University of Maine

Date Written: August 1, 2018

Abstract

While the sell-in-May effect appears to persist in the long run, the authors find that the anomaly is not present in non-election years (both mid-term and presidential elections). There is no significant difference between the May–October and November–April stock returns in non-election years. The observed sell-in-May effect is driven by poor stock returns in the May–October periods leading up to US presidential or congressional elections and subsequent strong performance in the November–April periods immediately following elections. The paper offers an election-year effect as an explanation of the sell-in-May anomaly that has been observed in the US stock market. Other possible explanations of the effect, such as seasonal affective disorder, the weather, and daylight savings time, have not gained widespread acceptance.

Keywords: Stock Market, Elections, Presidential, Midterm, Mid-Term Elections, Gubernatorial, Congressional Elections, Seasonality, Market Returns, Sell in May, Go Away

JEL Classification: G, G11, G14

Suggested Citation

Waggle, Doug and Agrrawal, Pankaj, Is the 'Sell in May and Go Away' Adage the Result of an Election-Year Effect? (August 1, 2018). Managerial Finance, v 44, 2018; DOI (10.1108/MF-12-2017-0505), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3230237

Doug Waggle

University of West Florida ( email )

11000 University Parkway
Pensacola, FL 32514-5750
United States

Pankaj Agrrawal (Contact Author)

University of Maine ( email )

Orono, ME 04469
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
333
PlumX Metrics