The Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict: Unnecessary Distraction or Mission-Relevant Priority?

NATO Open Publications 4(2)

28 Pages Posted: 29 Aug 2018

See all articles by Emma Cunliffe

Emma Cunliffe

Newcastle University

Paul Fox

Newcastle University

Peter Stone

University of Newcastle

Date Written: July 9, 2018

Abstract

It is inevitable that during armed conflict cultural heritage will be damaged and destroyed. Whilst there has been widespread consideration of how to protect communities, their heritage has not received the same consideration. Although their advice was largely ignored, for over 2,500 years military theorists – from Sun Tzu in 6th century BC China (Sun Tzu 1998) to von Clausewitz in 19th century Europe (von Clausewitz 1997) – have argued that damaging and destroying the cultural heritage of vanquished enemies is bad military practice (O'Keefe 2006), highlighting how its destruction and/or pillage can make occupied communities less easy to control, and can provide justification for the next conflict. Cultural heritage includes tangible places (such as historic sites and buildings), and moveable artefacts (like archives, libraries, art, and museum collections). These are collectively often referred to as cultural property. It also includes intangible remains of the past such as song, dance, and oral traditions remembered and 'carried' by individuals and communities. Intangible cultural heritage can be considered as part of the wider framework of protecting civilians. However, tangible manifestations of culture, here "cultural property" (CP) are frequently dismissed. This paper questions whether damage and destruction of cultural property really are inevitable, or whether at least some might be mitigated and avoided if appropriate action were taken. It begins with the historical background to cultural property protection (CPP), before introducing the Blue Shield (an NGO that works with the armed forces to protect CP). It demonstrates why CPP is important to the military, reflects on recent CPP activity, and concludes with some recommendations.

Keywords: CPP, NATO, Cultural property protection, armed conflict, heritage management, heritage, Blue Shield

Suggested Citation

Cunliffe, Emma and Fox, Paul and Stone, Peter, The Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict: Unnecessary Distraction or Mission-Relevant Priority? (July 9, 2018). NATO Open Publications 4(2), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3235346

Paul Fox

Newcastle University ( email )

5 Barrack Road
Devonshire Building
NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE, 2308 NE1 7RU
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.ncl.ac.uk/sacs/staff/profile/paulfox.html#background

Peter Stone

University of Newcastle ( email )

5 Barrack Road
Devonshire Building
NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE, 2308 NE1 7RU
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
291
Abstract Views
907
Rank
202,800
PlumX Metrics