R v. J.A.

(2018) 30(2) Canadian Journal of Women and the Law

29 Pages Posted: 29 Aug 2018

See all articles by Jennifer Koshan

Jennifer Koshan

University of Calgary - Faculty of Law

Date Written: August 20, 2018


This Women’s Court of Canada judgment considers the issue of whether parties can consent in advance to sexual activity that will occur while they are asleep or unconscious. The Supreme Court’s 2011 ruling in JA generated critique and debate amongst feminist and law and sexuality scholars that pitted women's equality and security interests against their affirmative sexual autonomy. The Women’s Court judgment analyzes whether it is possible to adopt an approach to advance consent that protects or at least balances all of these interests. My particular focus is the spousal sexual violence context, where courts have often interpreted the sexual assault provisions of the Criminal Code to the detriment of women’s sexual integrity and equality, yet where arguments about affirmative sexual autonomy have also predominated. Taking a harm-based approach to criminality that considers both negative and positive sexual autonomy, I conclude that advance consent should not be considered valid without certain legal safeguards being put into place. The judgment – which was originally published in 2016 and has been edited for length – is accompanied by a postscript where I reflect on the case from the fictional standpoint of a retired judge.

Keywords: Women's Court of Canada, Feminist Judgments, Sexual Assault, Marital Rape

Suggested Citation

Koshan, Jennifer, R v. J.A. (August 20, 2018). (2018) 30(2) Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3235542

Jennifer Koshan (Contact Author)

University of Calgary - Faculty of Law ( email )

Murray Fraser Hall
2500 University Drive NW
Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics