The Duty of Hong Kong Courts to Follow the NPCSC's Interpretation of the Basic Law: Are There Any Limits?

(2018) 48(1) Hong Kong Law Journal 167-191.

Posted: 31 Aug 2018

See all articles by Feng Lin

Feng Lin

School of Law, City University of Hong Kong

Date Written: August 23, 2018

Abstract

The Court of Final Appeal repeated in Yau Wai Ching v Chief Executive of HKSAR its position as stated in a few previous cases that the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (NPCSC) can clarify and supplement the Basic Law through its interpretation. This article questions that position. Through examining the evolution of the NPCSC’s legislative interpretation authority, this article argues that the enactment and implementation of the Legislation Law has imposed limits on the NPCSC’s authority to supplement the Basic Law through legislative interpretation. It further discusses the interaction between the NPCSC and the CFA in the interpretation of the Basic Law and makes a comparison with the mechanism to resolve conflict in interpretation between national courts and the European Court of Human Rights with regard to the European Convention on Human Rights. This article adds a novel intellectual approach to a very thorny issue and proposes some alternatives to resolve possible conflict between the NPCSC and the CFA with regard to the interpretation of the Basic Law.

Suggested Citation

Lin, Feng, The Duty of Hong Kong Courts to Follow the NPCSC's Interpretation of the Basic Law: Are There Any Limits? (August 23, 2018). (2018) 48(1) Hong Kong Law Journal 167-191. , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3237277

Feng Lin (Contact Author)

School of Law, City University of Hong Kong ( email )

83 Tat Chee Avenue
Kowloon
Hong Kong

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
161
PlumX Metrics