Transnational Constitutionalism and a Limited Doctrine of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment: A Reply to Rosalind Dixon and David Landau

International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 826-832, 2017

Posted: 26 Sep 2018

See all articles by Sujit Choudhry

Sujit Choudhry

Center for Constitutional Transitions; International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA); Center for Global Constitutionalism, WZB Berlin Social Science Center

Date Written: 2017

Abstract

As Rosalind Dixon and David Landau observe in their article, "Transnational Constitutionalism and a Limited Doctrine of Unconstitutional Amendment" (International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol.13, no. 3, pp. 606-638, 2015) the breakdown of constitutional democracy is a central fear of contemporary politics. On their account "abusive" constitutional amendments are central techniques for democratic backsliding, and judicial review of such amendments is justified on the basis that it safeguards democracy from itself. But on their account, the assertion of such a judicial power carries a potential danger -- that courts could overreach and second-guess constitutional amendments which do not pose an existential threat to constitutional democracy.

I engage Dixon and Landau on two points. First, I suggest that comparative constitutional law should premise its analysis of the problem of democratic backsliding not on the problem of unconstitutional constitutional amendments, but rather on a broader inventory of the various legal tools used by autocrats that enable democratic backsliding, which encompasses the abuse of the power of constitutional amendment but extends well beyond it. Secondary, the more likely scenario is not that courts will overreach, but rather than they will fail to call democratic backsliding by its name, which raises important strategic questions for courts on whether to embrace the power to declare constitutional amendments unconstitutional and on what basis, or to calibrate the combination of justification and judicial control differently.

Keywords: Constitutional Law, Constitutional Design, Backsliding

Suggested Citation

Choudhry, Sujit, Transnational Constitutionalism and a Limited Doctrine of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment: A Reply to Rosalind Dixon and David Landau (2017). International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 826-832, 2017. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3238521

Sujit Choudhry (Contact Author)

Center for Constitutional Transitions ( email )

HOME PAGE: constitutionaltransitions.org

International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA) ( email )

336 East 45th Street
14th Floor
New York, NY 10017
United States

Center for Global Constitutionalism, WZB Berlin Social Science Center ( email )

Reichpietschufer 50
D-10785 Berlin, 10785
Germany

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
209
PlumX Metrics