Understanding State Agency Independence

55 Pages Posted: 27 Aug 2018 Last revised: 12 Nov 2018

See all articles by Miriam Seifter

Miriam Seifter

University of Wisconsin Law School

Date Written: August 8, 2018

Abstract

Conflicts about the independence of executive-branch officials are brewing across the states. Governors vie with separately elected executive officials for policy control; attorneys general and governors spar over who speaks for the state in litigation; and legislatures seek to alter governors’ influence over independent state commissions. These disputes over intra-state authority have weighty policy implications both within states and beyond them, on topics from election administration and energy markets to healthcare and welfare. The disputes also reveal a blind spot. At the federal level, scholars have long analyzed the meaning and effects of agency independence—a dialogue that has deepened under the Trump Administration. In contrast, there is virtually no systematic scholarly attention to the theory or practice of agency independence in the states.

This Article begins that study. Surveying historical developments, judicial decisions, and legislative enactments across the country, it shows that state agency independence is an inexact, unstable, and variegated concept. Whereas federal courts treat independent agencies as a distinct legal category, state courts eschew categorization in favor of contextual holdings. Moreover, despite the common notion that states’ plural-executive structure cements independence, these rulings just as frequently undermine it. State legislatures, for their part, revisit independence frequently, often in the wake of partisan realignments. And their creations are diverse, combining a range of vectors of insulation in different arrangements. The result is that there is no single meaning of state agency independence even within a state, and rarely a strong norm surrounding it.

States’ legislatively driven, bespoke approach to independence offers insights for scholars of both state and federal institutional design. The state approach may yield better-tailored and more democratic arrangements. But it also displays raw partisanship, and the combination of weak norms with strong governors may stack the deck against independence. The state approach also raises deeper questions for public law: What are the costs and benefits of allowing the rules of the game to be consistently up for grabs? There is no formula for weighing these considerations beyond the context of any individual dispute, but this Article provides a launching pad for their sustained exploration.

Keywords: administrative law, state & local government law, executive power, separation of powers, agency independence

JEL Classification: K10, K23

Suggested Citation

Seifter, Miriam, Understanding State Agency Independence (August 8, 2018). 117 Michigan Law Review (forthcoming 2019); Univ. of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1450. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3239628 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3239628

Miriam Seifter (Contact Author)

University of Wisconsin Law School ( email )

975 Bascom Mall
Madison, WI 53706
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
148
rank
189,153
Abstract Views
655
PlumX Metrics