Five Different Species of Legal Tests--And What They All Have in Common

31 Pages Posted: 11 Sep 2018

See all articles by Brendan T. Beery

Brendan T. Beery

Western Michigan University Cooley Law School

Dan Ray

Western Michigan University Thomas M. Cooley Law School; Independent

Date Written: August 29, 2018

Abstract

As every law-school graduate knows, not all the legal world is categorical or elemental. Outcomes are often uncertain. This can be troubling news, but there is good news as well: first, the different species of legal tests (and there are at least five) are capable of being described, and their purposes understood. Second, most (if not all) rules have one thing in common: they are just if-then propositions.

In this essay, we explain some different species of legal tests: elements, factors, balancing tests, means-ends tests, and categorical tests. We also briefly discuss the best structure for legal reasoning—the conditional syllogism—and provide a new way of presenting that structure to students and practitioners alike. Finally, we discuss how to apply rules as if-then propositions, regardless what kind of test is being applied.

Keywords: legal reasoning, syllogism, deductive reasoning, law students, legal education, legal writing

Suggested Citation

Beery, Brendan Thomas and Ray, Daniel R., Five Different Species of Legal Tests--And What They All Have in Common (August 29, 2018). Quinnipiac Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3240972

Brendan Thomas Beery (Contact Author)

Western Michigan University Cooley Law School ( email )

300 S. Capitol Avenue
P.O. Box 13038
Lansing, MI 48901
United States

Daniel R. Ray

Western Michigan University Thomas M. Cooley Law School ( email )

300 S. Capitol Avenue
P.O. Box 13038
Lansing, MI 48901
United States

Independent ( email )

No Address Available

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
459
Abstract Views
1,177
rank
62,652
PlumX Metrics