Clemency and Constitutional Duties in Indonesia: A Promise Made is a Promise Kept?

24 Pages Posted: 30 Aug 2018

Date Written: August 30, 2018

Abstract

This article investigates the clemency process for the two Australians on death row in Indonesia, Myuran Sukumaran and Andrew Chan. It examines the relevant legislative provisions, the presidential oath, prior decisions within the Indonesian justice system, and public media statements, and offers an interpretation of the standard of the duties of administrative officers under Indonesian law. It concludes that rendering clemency rejection decisions immune from review, particularly in circumstances where such immunity could lead to the death of the applicant, is against the spirit of the reforms that were enacted in Indonesia after 1998 to avoid dictatorial rule and arbitrary decision-making. If a clemency process is to be undertaken, good governance demands that decision-makers are subject to rigorous testing and review.

Suggested Citation

Holland, Bradley, Clemency and Constitutional Duties in Indonesia: A Promise Made is a Promise Kept? (August 30, 2018). Australian Journal of Asian Law, 2018, Vol 19 No 1, Article 2: 23-45, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3241076

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
93
Abstract Views
756
rank
349,826
PlumX Metrics