What is and is Not Pathological in Criminal Law

18 Pages Posted: 31 Aug 2018

See all articles by Kyron Huigens

Kyron Huigens

Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Date Written: August 30, 2018

Abstract

This article responds to William J. Stuntz’s 2001 article, The Pathological Politics of Criminal Law. Stuntz describes the shift of power over sentencing from judges to prosecutors as “pathological.” I argue that the shift is part of a more general shift in governmental powers toward the executive branch, and that the shift serves the legitimate function of making criminal law more responsive to legitimate expectations of the public. Legal judgments about crimes and criminals must match the public’s moral judgments, and prosecutorial discretion serves this decidedly non-pathological function.

Suggested Citation

Huigens, Kyron, What is and is Not Pathological in Criminal Law (August 30, 2018). Michigan Law Review, Vol. 101, No. 3, 2002, Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3241769

Kyron Huigens (Contact Author)

Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )

55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States
212-790-0404 (Phone)
212-790-0205 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://cardozo.yu.edu/directory/kyron-james-huigens

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
2
Abstract Views
132
PlumX Metrics