Tax Competition and the Ethics of Burden Sharing
41 Pages Posted: 24 Sep 2018 Last revised: 10 Nov 2018
Date Written: August 30, 2018
Tax scholars have long suggested that tax competition should be mitigated because it reduces the collective revenues of countries, impairs their ability to redistribute wealth, and produces more regressive tax systems. Likewise, international organizations such as the OECD and the European Union increasingly move towards designing a global framework aimed at reducing tax avoidance and mitigating tax competition.
However, there is no comprehensive discussion on the costs that would arise from institutional reform designed to tackle tax competition. To the extent that any change in the international tax order will benefit some countries but also harm others, an ethical analysis of tax competition should include an examination of how to distribute the losses resulting from overall institutional reform. As international policy decisions tend to reproduce the present imbalance of the global power, the lack of an explicit discussion on how to share the costs arising from an institutional change might result in countries with less negotiating power bearing most of these costs.
This Article introduces the costs side of curbing tax competition and offers four normative principles that can help illuminate how the burdens of reforming the current international tax regime should be shared among countries.
Keywords: tax competition, cost-side analysis, burden sharing, fairness, developing countries, global justice, CBDR
JEL Classification: H26, H77, K34, F23, F42, F53, F55, H87, K33, K34, O19
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation