Magnificent Failure Revisited: Modern Maryland Constitutional Law from 1967 to 1998

74 Pages Posted: 22 Sep 2018 Last revised: 28 Nov 2022

Date Written: January 1, 1999

Abstract

On May 14, 1968, Maryland voters rejected a proposed new state constitution. In the immediate aftermath, John P. Wheeler, Jr. and Melissa Kinsey analyzed this proposed constitution and described its defeat as a "magnificent failure"; this phrase captures both the extraordinary
efforts and visionary proposals of the framers, and the failure of the electorate to approve it. Thirty years later, it is appropriate to reassess the proposals, analyze the continuing effects of their rejection, and examine Maryland's subsequent constitutional developments. This Article assesses the success or failure of the Maryland Constitutional Convention in light of the later adoption -- by constitutional amendment, statute, or regulation -- of many of the important innovations proposed in the 1967-1968 constitution.

Suggested Citation

Friedman, Dan, Magnificent Failure Revisited: Modern Maryland Constitutional Law from 1967 to 1998 (January 1, 1999). Maryland Law Review, Vol. 58, No. 2, 1999, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3242748

Dan Friedman (Contact Author)

Appellate Court of Maryland

361 Rowe Boulevard
Annapolis, MD Maryland 21204
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
35
Abstract Views
312
PlumX Metrics