Determining the Legal Status of Unmanned Maritime Vehicles: Formalism vs Functionalism

43 Pages Posted: 26 Sep 2018  

Craig H. Allen

University of Washington - School of Law; UW Arctic Law and Policy Institute

Date Written: September 4, 2018

Abstract

The introduction of unmanned maritime vehicles (UMV) raises a number of international law issues. In its 1951 decision in the Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries case the International Court of Justice set out the formal, two-step approach for analyzing such international law questions. For most maritime nations, the legal status of UMV is governed principally by the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. To the extent the status question requires interpretation of that Convention, the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties prescribes the method. In their rush to accommodate the introduction of UMV into the world’s waterways, some UMV advocates appear ready to circumvent established methods for making, amending, and interpreting treaties. This article argues that respect for the global rules-based order argues against such expediencies.

Keywords: Unmanned, Maritime, Vehicles, LOS Convention, International Maritime Organization, Robotics

JEL Classification: K23, K33, L38, L50, L62, L91, L98

Suggested Citation

Allen, Craig H., Determining the Legal Status of Unmanned Maritime Vehicles: Formalism vs Functionalism (September 4, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3244172 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3244172

Craig H. Allen (Contact Author)

University of Washington - School of Law ( email )

William H. Gates Hall
Box 353020
Seattle, WA 98105-3020
United States
202-616-8302 (Phone)
202-616-4519 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: https://www.law.washington.edu/directory/profile.aspx?ID=113

UW Arctic Law and Policy Institute ( email )

Campus Box 353020
Seattle, WA 98195-3020
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
34
Abstract Views
107
PlumX