Liquidity vs. Wealth in Household Debt Obligations: Evidence from Housing Policy in the Great Recession

54 Pages Posted: 17 Sep 2018

See all articles by Peter Ganong

Peter Ganong

University of Chicago

Pascal Noel

University of Chicago Booth School of Business

Date Written: August 2018

Abstract

We use variation in mortgage modifications to disentangle the impact of reducing long-term obligations with no change in short-term payments (“wealth”), and reducing short-term payments with approximately no change in long-term obligations (“liquidity”). Using regression discontinuity and difference-in-differences research designs with administrative data measuring default and consumption, we find that principal reductions that increase housing wealth without affecting liquidity have no effect, while maturity extensions that increase only liquidity have large effects. Our results suggest that liquidity drives borrower default and consumption decisions, and that distressed debt restructurings can be redesigned with substantial gains to borrowers, lenders, and taxpayers.

Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.

Suggested Citation

Ganong, Peter and Noel, Pascal, Liquidity vs. Wealth in Household Debt Obligations: Evidence from Housing Policy in the Great Recession (August 2018). NBER Working Paper No. w24964. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3244247

Peter Ganong (Contact Author)

University of Chicago ( email )

1101 East 58th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
United States

Pascal Noel

University of Chicago Booth School of Business ( email )

No Address Available

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
10
Abstract Views
132
PlumX Metrics