Functional Justiciability and the Existence of a Dispute: A Means of Jurisdictional Avoidance?

25 Pages Posted: 10 Sep 2018

See all articles by Manuel Casas

Manuel Casas

Yale University - Law School

Date Written: September 8, 2018

Abstract

In the recent Obligations concerning Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament string of cases the International Court of Justice declined jurisdiction by holding that there was no dispute between the parties. This Article examines the Court’s treatment of the existence of a dispute (“EoD”) jurisdictional objection; it does not purport to analyze the Court’s broader reliance on jurisdictional doctrines as a general means of avoiding cases.

From a doctrinal perspective, this Article argues that the Court’s interpretation of the EoD objection in those cases is unpersuasive. Instead, the Article contends that the Court has relied on the existence of a dispute objection as a covert or functional justiciability doctrine. That is, as a ground for discretionarily declining jurisdiction or, to borrow a term from private international law, as an escape device. The Article considers that such jurisdictional avoidance may be justified, doctrinally and normatively, as a form of principled avoidance. Normatively, the decision to rely on a procedural technicality to avoid going into the merits of a potentially explosive case may be seen as a valid exercise of judicial self-restraint – and one that can aid the Court navigate the tensions created by increased skepticism of international adjudication. And policy-wise, avoiding a case on a sensible subject-matter that touches on core aspects of defense and national security could be accepted as a way of side-stepping potential backlash.

Keywords: International Court of Justice, Justiciability, Jurisdiction, Preliminary Objections, Nuclear Weapons, Existence of a Dispute, Marshall Islands, Backlash, Enforcement

Suggested Citation

Casas, Manuel, Functional Justiciability and the Existence of a Dispute: A Means of Jurisdictional Avoidance? (September 8, 2018). European Society of International Law (ESIL) 2018 Research Forum (Jerusalem). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3246182

Manuel Casas (Contact Author)

Yale University - Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
18
Abstract Views
88
PlumX