Undue Influence: A Prosecutor's Role in Parole Proceedings

13 Pages Posted: 11 Sep 2018

Date Written: September 10, 2018


Professor Cassidy explores what it means for a prosecutor to act as a “minister of justice” in the context of parole proceedings. He argues that prosecutors should not perceive themselves as zealous advocates in what is essentially an administrative setting, and that prosecutors should not oppose release simply because they believe that the nature and circumstances of the crime warrant continued incarceration. Rather, Cassidy argues that prosecutors ordinarily should refrain from personally testifying at parole hearings, and should submit written comments to the parole board only in those rare situations where the prosecutor is in possession of otherwise unavailable information pertaining to an inmate’s post-conviction behavior that would assist the board in making an accurate legal and factual determination. Cassidy surveys the approaches taken by parole board statutes and regulations in fifty states and discusses which of those approaches properly calibrate the scope and limits of a prosecutor’s input in release decisions.

Suggested Citation

Cassidy, R. Michael, Undue Influence: A Prosecutor's Role in Parole Proceedings (September 10, 2018). Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Forthcoming, Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 490, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3247326

R. Michael Cassidy (Contact Author)

Boston College - Law School ( email )

885 Centre Street
Newton, MA 02459-1163
United States
617-552-4343 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics