Functionalism, Fragmentation, and the Future of International (Trade) Law

20 Pages Posted: 13 Oct 2018

See all articles by Joel P. Trachtman

Joel P. Trachtman

Tufts University - The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy

Date Written: September 20, 2018

Abstract

This paper makes three related points. First, in order to achieve efficient levels and types of international cooperation, it will be necessary to overcome fragmentation, both in international legislation and in international adjudication. Second, WTO dispute settlement has avoided making cross-sectoral trade-offs that would effectively overcome fragmentation, in part because it generally avoids evaluation of regulatory rationales, and in part because its mandate does not allow application of international law beyond the covered agreements. Third, even if we overcame the fragmentation problem in legislation and adjudication, we would still need to move toward majority voting to reach an efficient level of international law-making.

Keywords: trade, WTO, fragmentation, functionalism, Hudec

JEL Classification: F02, F1, F13, F16, F16, F18, K33

Suggested Citation

Trachtman, Joel P., Functionalism, Fragmentation, and the Future of International (Trade) Law (September 20, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3252637 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3252637

Joel P. Trachtman (Contact Author)

Tufts University - The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
359
Abstract Views
1,280
Rank
161,345
PlumX Metrics