Pendency in the Indian Criminal Process: A Creature of Crisis of Flawed Design?

23 Pages Posted: 21 Oct 2018 Last revised: 27 Oct 2018

Date Written: October 25, 2018

Abstract

More than two hundred million cases are pending across trial courts in India today, and a majority of these are criminal trials. Despite legislative innovation in 1973 designed to achieve speedy case disposition, and the introduction of plea-bargaining in 2005, the rise in case pendency continues unabated. This paper argues that while reform efforts have primarily focused on enhancing supply-side factors - more judges, more courts, more time - this is hardly a sufficient basis for dealing with the problem. Together with this, a closer look must be had at the serious flaws in how the Indian criminal process is designed, which engender delays. If governments in India hope to curb delays, resolving these flaws is as necessary – if not more – as increased government spending on the judiciary and imposing time-limits on litigants.

Keywords: Criminal Process, Case Pendency, Criminal Procedure, India, Plea Bargaining, Delays

Suggested Citation

Sekhri, Abhinav, Pendency in the Indian Criminal Process: A Creature of Crisis of Flawed Design? (October 25, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3256609 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3256609

Abhinav Sekhri (Contact Author)

Delhi High Court ( email )

Delhi
India Gate
Delhi, 110003
India

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
54
rank
352,462
Abstract Views
138
PlumX