Searching for Salvageable Ideas in FICALA

17 Pages Posted: 26 Oct 2018

Date Written: 2018


The proposed Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2017 (FICALA) represents the most aggressive attempt in recent memory to dismantle the apparatus of mass litigation through procedural reform. When viewed as a whole, it is difficult to see the package as anything other than a defendant-driven effort to reduce liability by making it difficult for plaintiffs to aggregate claims, difficult for plaintiffs’ lawyers to make money, and expensive for plaintiffs to pursue claims to adjudication. Hidden among FICALA’s bad ideas, however, are a few good ones, and they represent promising opportunities for improving the litigation process. This article, part of a symposium on Civil Litigation Reform in the Trump Era, breaks down the bill’s proposals and considers each idea on its own terms. The bill contains several pieces that, if tweaked, could offer attractive starting points for procedural reform: provisions that align class counsel fees with value for class members, provisions that improve data collection concerning class action settlements, and a provision to work around the complete diversity requirement for federal jurisdiction in mass disputes.

Keywords: FICALA, H.R. 985, class action, MDL, class settlement, diversity jurisdiction, Rule 23, attorneys' fees

JEL Classification: K41

Suggested Citation

Erichson, Howard M., Searching for Salvageable Ideas in FICALA (2018). 87 Fordham Law Review 19 (2018), Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3260084, Available at SSRN:

Howard M. Erichson (Contact Author)

Fordham University School of Law ( email )

150 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
646-312-8233 (Phone)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics