The Differential Impact of Bank Size on Systemic Risk

34 Pages Posted: 5 Oct 2018

See all articles by Amy Lorenc

Amy Lorenc

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Jeffery Y. Zhang

University of Michigan Law School

Date Written: 2018-09-28

Abstract

We examine whether financial stress at larger banks has a different impact on the real economy than financial stress at smaller banks. Our empirical results show that stress experienced by banks in the top 1 percent of the size distribution leads to a statistically significant and negative impact on the real economy. This impact increases with the size of the bank. The negative impact on quarterly real GDP growth caused by stress at banks in the top 0.15 percent of the size distribution is more than twice as large as the impact caused by stress at banks in the top 0.75 percent, and more than three times as large as the impact caused by stress at banks in the top 1 percent. These results are broadly informative as to how the stringency of regulatory standards should vary with bank size, and support the idea that the largest banks should be subject to the most stringent requirements while smaller banks should be subject to successively less stringent requirements.

Keywords: Bank failures, Bank size, Financial regulation, Systemic risk, Tailoring

JEL Classification: G21, G28

Suggested Citation

Lorenc, Amy and Zhang, Jeffery Y., The Differential Impact of Bank Size on Systemic Risk (2018-09-28). FEDS Working Paper No. 2018-066, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 62, June 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3260393 or http://dx.doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2018.066

Amy Lorenc (Contact Author)

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ( email )

20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20551
United States

Jeffery Y. Zhang

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
201
Abstract Views
578
Rank
325,507
PlumX Metrics