Beyond the Balance Sheet Model of Banking: Implications for Bank Regulation and Monetary Policy

81 Pages Posted: 15 Oct 2018 Last revised: 27 Jul 2022

See all articles by Greg Buchak

Greg Buchak

Stanford University Graduate School of Business

Gregor Matvos

Northwestern University - Kellogg School of Management

Tomasz Piskorski

Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Finance

Amit Seru

Stanford University

Date Written: July 25, 2022

Abstract

Bank balance sheet lending is commonly viewed as the predominant form of lending. We document and study two margins of adjustment that are usually absent from this view using microdata in the $10 trillion U.S. residential mortgage market. We first document the limits of the shadow bank substitution margin: shadow banks substitute for traditional—deposit-taking—banks in loans which are easily sold, but are limited from activities requiring on-balance-sheet financing. We then document the balance sheet retention margin: banks switch between traditional balance sheet lending and selling loans based on their balance sheet strength, behaving more like shadow banks following negative shocks. Motivated by this evidence, we build and estimate a workhorse structural model of the financial intermediation sector. Banks and shadow banks compete for borrowers. Banks face regulatory constraints but benefit from the ability to engage in balance sheet lending. Critically, departing from prior literature, banks can also choose to access the securitization market like shadow banks. To evaluate distributional consequences, we model a rich demand system with income and house price differences across borrowers. The model is identified using spatial pricing policies of government-sponsored entities and bunching at the regulatory threshold. We study the quantitative consequences of several policies on lending volume and pricing, bank stability, and the distribution of consumer surplus across rich and poor households. Both margins we identify significantly shape policy responses, accounting for more than $500 billion in lending volume across counterfactuals. Secondary market disruptions such as quantitative easing have significantly larger impacts on lending and redistribution than capital requirement changes once we account for these margins. We conclude that a regulatory policy analysis of the intermediation sector must incorporate the intricate industrial organization of the credit market and the equilibrium interaction of banks and shadow banks.

Keywords: Shadow Banks, Balance Sheet Capacity, Market Segmentation, Capital Requirements, Lending, Mortgages, GSEs, Unconventional Monetary Policy

JEL Classification: G2, L5

Suggested Citation

Buchak, Greg and Matvos, Gregor and Piskorski, Tomasz and Seru, Amit, Beyond the Balance Sheet Model of Banking: Implications for Bank Regulation and Monetary Policy (July 25, 2022). Columbia Business School Research Paper No. 18-75, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3260434 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3260434

Greg Buchak

Stanford University Graduate School of Business ( email )

655 Knight Way
Stanford, CA 94305-5015
United States
6507214004 (Phone)
94305 (Fax)

Gregor Matvos

Northwestern University - Kellogg School of Management ( email )

2001 Sheridan Road
Evanston, IL 60208
United States

Tomasz Piskorski

Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Finance ( email )

3022 Broadway
New York, NY 10027
United States

Amit Seru (Contact Author)

Stanford University ( email )

Stanford, CA 94305
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,395
Abstract Views
7,213
Rank
23,748
PlumX Metrics