On Intermediate Headcount Indices of Poverty

9 Pages Posted: 10 Oct 2018

See all articles by S. Subramanian

S. Subramanian

Independent

Diganta Mukherjee

Indian Statistical Institute, New Delhi - Economic Research Unit

Date Written: October 2018

Abstract

The archetypal population‐relative measure of poverty is the Headcount Ratio, while the archetypal population‐absolute measure is the Aggregate Headcount. The overwhelming emphasis in the poverty measurement literature has been on population‐relative measures. The value‐basis for this preference has been seldom submitted to serious scrutiny, with the result that absolute and intermediate measures have generally been subjected to relative neglect. There would appear to be a strong case for the employment of indices which are intermediate between relative and absolute measures, and which avoid the extreme values underlying both. The present note, building on earlier work by scholars such as Arriaga, Krtscha, Del Rio, Alonso‐Villar, Mukherjee, Zheng and Zoli, aims to advance the cause of a workable and plausible population‐intermediate headcount index of poverty.

Keywords: absolute headcount measure, intermediate headcount measure, population focus, relative headcount measure, replication invariance, scale invariance, translation invariance

Suggested Citation

Subramanian, S. and Mukherjee, Diganta, On Intermediate Headcount Indices of Poverty (October 2018). Bulletin of Economic Research, Vol. 70, Issue 4, pp. 443-451, 2018. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3263618 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/boer.12135

S. Subramanian (Contact Author)

Independent

No Address Available
United States

Diganta Mukherjee

Indian Statistical Institute, New Delhi - Economic Research Unit ( email )

203 B. T. Road
Calcutta, 700 035
India

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
1
Abstract Views
124
PlumX Metrics