Addressing Infringement: Developments in Content Regulation in the US and the DNS

Forthcoming, The Oxford Handbook of Online Intermediary Liability, ed. Giancarlo Frosio

14 Pages Posted: 17 Oct 2018 Last revised: 6 Nov 2018

See all articles by Annemarie Bridy

Annemarie Bridy

University of Idaho; Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society

Date Written: October 11, 2018

Abstract

Over the course of the last decade, in response to significant pressure from the US government and other governments, service providers have assumed private obligations to regulate online content that have no basis in public law. For US tech companies, a robust regime of “voluntary agreements” to resolve content-related disputes has grown up on the margins of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and the Communications Decency Act (CDA). For the most part, this regime has been built for the benefit of intellectual property rightholders attempting to control online piracy and counterfeiting beyond the territorial limits of the United States and without recourse to judicial process.

The reach of privately ordered online content regulation is wide and deepening. It is wide in terms of the range of service providers that have already partnered with corporations and trade associations to block sites, terminate accounts, and remove content without court orders. It is deepening with reference to the Internet’s protocol stack, migrating downward from the application layer into the network’s technical infrastructure, specifically, the Domain Name System (DNS). While enforcement of intellectual property rights is the purpose for which these agreements exist, the site-blocking procedures they institutionalize are readily adaptable for use in censoring all kinds of disfavored content.

Recent private agreements between DNS intermediaries and intellectual property rightholders cross the Rubicon. Such agreements, which are the subject of this chapter, are cause for special concern among open Internet advocates, because they transform technical network intermediaries into content regulators in an unprecedented way. They expand the remit of domain name registrars and registry operators beyond their raison d’être, which is the administration of the Internet's addressing system and the maintenance of its operational security and stability. As these private, under-the-radar agreements multiply, they are taking a tangible but hard-to-measure toll on the global environment for freedom of speech and access to information online.

Keywords: DMCA, CDA, ICANN, DNS, copyright, counterfeiting, piracy, domain names, Internet, UDRP, ADR

Suggested Citation

Bridy, Annemarie, Addressing Infringement: Developments in Content Regulation in the US and the DNS (October 11, 2018). Forthcoming, The Oxford Handbook of Online Intermediary Liability, ed. Giancarlo Frosio. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3264879

Annemarie Bridy (Contact Author)

University of Idaho ( email )

PO Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0051
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.uidaho.edu/law/people/faculty/abridy

Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society ( email )

Palo Alto, CA
United States

HOME PAGE: http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/about/people/annemarie-bridy

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
61
rank
334,688
Abstract Views
315
PlumX Metrics