New Conservatives, Amendments, and Party Loyalty

34 Pages Posted: 4 Nov 2018

See all articles by Chris Den Hartog

Chris Den Hartog

California State Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo

Timothy Nokken

Texas Tech University, Department of Political Science

Date Written: September 1, 2018

Abstract

We explore the extent to which “New Conservatives” — i.e., the Tea Party, Liberty, and Freedom Caucuses — succeeded in shifting policy outcomes rightward by adding conservative amendments to measures that later passed the House. We do so by focusing primarily on data from the 112th through 115th Congresses (2011-2018). We find that while New Conservatives offer many amendments and the House agrees to many of their amendments, there is little evidence that their amendments lead to House passage of legislation that is more conservative than legislation without New Conservative amendments. Our results suggest multiple possible explanations: perhaps, when offering amendments, New Conservatives are more pragmatic than they are sometime credited for being; or perhaps there the process that determines which amendments are voted on is more likely to preclude votes upon, or perhaps even the offering of, New Conservatives’ most conservative amendments. We discuss additional work that might help explain our findings.

Keywords: Party Loyalty, House of Representatives, Freedom Caucus, Amending Process

Suggested Citation

Den Hartog, Chris and Nokken, Timothy, New Conservatives, Amendments, and Party Loyalty (September 1, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3265376 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3265376

Chris Den Hartog

California State Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo ( email )

San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
United States

Timothy Nokken (Contact Author)

Texas Tech University, Department of Political Science ( email )

United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
12
Abstract Views
132
PlumX Metrics