The Effectiveness of Leniency Programs when Firms choose the Degree of Collusion

22 Pages Posted: 11 Nov 2018 Last revised: 30 Jun 2020

See all articles by Winand Emons

Winand Emons

University of Bern - Institute of Economics; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: October 19, 2018

Abstract

An antitrust authority deters collusion using fines and a leniency program. It chooses the probability of an investigation. Firms pick the degree of collusion: The more they collude, the higher are profits, but so is the probability of detection. Firms thus trade-off higher profits against higher expected fines. If firms are sufficiently patient, leniency is ineffective; it may even increase collusion. Increasing the probability of an investigation at low levels does not increase deterrence. Increasing the probability of an investigation at high levels reduces collusion, yet never completely.

Keywords: antitrust, cartels, deterrence, leniency

JEL Classification: D43, K21, K42, L40

Suggested Citation

Emons, Winand, The Effectiveness of Leniency Programs when Firms choose the Degree of Collusion (October 19, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3269740 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3269740

Winand Emons (Contact Author)

University of Bern - Institute of Economics ( email )

Schanzeneckstrasse 1
Postfach 8573
CH-3001 Bern
Switzerland
+41 31 721 76 47 (Phone)
+41 31 684 3783 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://winand-emons.ch/

Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)

London
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
131
Abstract Views
1,129
Rank
454,187
PlumX Metrics