The Effects of Fundamental Rights in Private Disputes

Hugh Collins (org.), European Contract Law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights, Cambridge: Intersentia, 2017

41 Pages Posted: 16 Nov 2018

Date Written: 2017

Abstract

This Essay articulates two intertwined points about the effects of fundamental rights in private disputes. First, it presents a case against the doctrine of direct horizontal effect, although not on the familiar grounds that it places individual freedom in jeopardy. It argues instead that legislative mediation instantiates values of legal certainty, deliberative idleness, and political legitimacy cherished in a constitutional democracy. The second point is that the quarrel concerning the horizontal effect of fundamental rights is not outcome-neutral. The fact that such rights bind directly only law-making agencies has normative consequences both in terms of their influence on private litigation and in terms of the responsibilities of the state qua law-maker. These arguments are doubly conditional. On the one hand, they are based on three premises of constitutional theory discussed in the first section: protective entitlements, fundamental rights as principles, and a concentrated model of judicial review of legislation. On the other hand, the rejection of direct horizontal effect is not absolute: it holds only within the core case where the premises obtain, thereby allowing a number of non-core cases of direct effect.

Keywords: Horizontal Effect, Rights as Principles, Rule of Law

Suggested Citation

Almeida Ribeiro, Gonçalo, The Effects of Fundamental Rights in Private Disputes (2017). Hugh Collins (org.), European Contract Law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights, Cambridge: Intersentia, 2017. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3271054

Gonçalo Almeida Ribeiro (Contact Author)

Católica Global School of Law ( email )

Lisboa
Portugal

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
22
Abstract Views
63
PlumX Metrics