Enforcement and Withdrawal under the California-Quebec (and not Ontario) Cap-and-Trade Linkage Agreement

12 Pages Posted: 15 Nov 2018 Last revised: 18 Nov 2018

Date Written: October 24, 2018

Abstract

Federal governments in Canada and the United States continue to face challenges in developing and implementing nation-wide carbon pricing mechanisms. In this context, sub-national initiatives continue to define much of climate law and policy in North America, with the California-Quebec-Ontario linkage breaking transnational ground in recent years. Two dimensions of critical importance to the efficacy of any emissions trading regime are enforcement and withdrawal. The California-Quebec-Ontario linkage provides an opportunity to observe these dimensions in action. This paper examines enforcement and withdrawal in this functioning multi-jurisdiction emissions trading regime, finding that enforcement regimes are relatively robust, relying on principles of reciprocation and harmonization. However, these strong enforcement regimes are undermined by the ease with which a jurisdiction (i.e. Ontario) can withdraw without consequence. The paper concludes with reflections on lessons and next steps.

Keywords: climate change, emissions trading, environmental law, carbon emissions, cap-and-trade, linkage

JEL Classification: K13, K32

Suggested Citation

Wright, David V., Enforcement and Withdrawal under the California-Quebec (and not Ontario) Cap-and-Trade Linkage Agreement (October 24, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3272541 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3272541

David V. Wright (Contact Author)

University of Calgary ( email )

University Drive
Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4
Canada

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
186
Abstract Views
964
Rank
295,689
PlumX Metrics