Beyond the Elements: Erie and the Standards for Preliminary and Permanent Injunctions

37 Pages Posted: 7 Nov 2018 Last revised: 12 May 2019

See all articles by Michael Morley

Michael Morley

Florida State University - College of Law

Date Written: December 31, 2018

Abstract

Federal courts frequently avoid deciding whether federal or state law governs the availability of injunctive relief for state-law claims by simply declaring that both sets of standards are the same. Although federal and state standards for injunctions often incorporate similar elements, those elements often are phrased in somewhat different terms and relate to each other in different ways. Even when federal and state standards involve facially identical elements, federal and state courts often interpret and apply them differently based on completely distinct bodies of precedent that can lead to different outcomes. Because state and federal standards arise from, and refer to, distinct bodies of precedent that constitute different sets of guideposts for future rulings, federal courts should not treat them as fungible to avoid difficult Erie questions.

Keywords: Erie, permanent injunction, preliminary injunction, choice of law, equity, federalism, Guaranty Trust, elements, precedent, caselaw

Suggested Citation

Morley, Michael, Beyond the Elements: Erie and the Standards for Preliminary and Permanent Injunctions (December 31, 2018). 52 Akron L. Rev. 457 (2019); FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 898. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3272546

Michael Morley (Contact Author)

Florida State University - College of Law ( email )

425 W. Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32306
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
36
Abstract Views
293
PlumX Metrics