Legitimacy Test for Criminal Sanction: Antitrust Law Perspective

11 Global Competition Litigation Review, Issue 4 (November 2018)

17 Pages Posted: 3 Jan 2019 Last revised: 11 Jan 2019

Date Written: October 5, 2018

Abstract

The issue of imprisonment as a means to deter competition law offences is widely debated in doctrine. The purpose of this article is not to expound the ideas already mentioned in the legal literature on the advantages/disadvantages of such a sentence. This paper will focus on the question of whether imprisonment is a legitimate punishment to deter anti-competitive behaviours, regarding the theoretical, legal and/or practical difficulties encountered for a successful policy of European antitrust criminalization. To answer this question, the prison sentence issue against managers involved in cartel practices requires the application of a legitimacy test. Regarding this test, three conditions must be examined to legitimize the imprisonment of individuals responsible for an anticompetitive practice: the seriousness of the practice, the risk of type 1 error, and the social consensus on the seriousness of market violations.

Keywords: competition law, prison sentence, social consensus, type 1 error

JEL Classification: K10, K14, K2, K20, K21, K22

Suggested Citation

de Moncuit, Godefroy, Legitimacy Test for Criminal Sanction: Antitrust Law Perspective (October 5, 2018). 11 Global Competition Litigation Review, Issue 4 (November 2018) , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3273415 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3273415

Godefroy De Moncuit (Contact Author)

University Paris II Pantheon Assas ( email )

Paris

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
222
Abstract Views
924
rank
189,820
PlumX Metrics