Building Intellectual Property Infrastructure Along China's Belt and Road
29 Pages Posted: 31 Oct 2018 Last revised: 5 Nov 2018
Date Written: October 31, 2018
In the past decade, China has played pivotal roles in developing initiatives such as the BRICS Summit, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the New Development Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. China has also negotiated a number of bilateral and regional free trade agreements, connecting the country to markets in Asia, Australasia, Europe, South America and other parts of the world. Many of these agreements include provisions or chapters on intellectual property protection and enforcement.
One new initiative that has not received much scholarly and policy attention from intellectual property commentators concerns the slowly emerging "One Belt, One Road" Initiative, which has now been officially translated as the "Belt and Road Initiative" (BRI). Launched in fall 2013, this initiative aims to facilitate global and regional connectivity through two distinct routes: the land-based Silk Road Economic Belt and the sea-based 21st-century Maritime Silk Road.
Written for the "Development of Intellectual Property Law in Asia" Symposium, this Article aims to introduce the BRI to intellectual property literature. It begins by documenting the recent changes to China’s approach toward international intellectual property norm setting. The article then outlines five sets of inquiries that could help enhance our understanding of the BRI. Pointing out that this initiative has not developed much in the intellectual property area, the article makes salient the opportunity to shape the future of the initiative in the intellectual property area.
The second half of the article takes advantage of this opportunity to explore the plausible developments of the BRI in six distinct areas of cooperation: substantive standards, procedural arrangements, cross-border enforcement, dispute resolution, technical cooperation and market aggregation. It concludes by briefly identifying three distinct camps that have very different views on the prospects and perils of the BRI.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation