Institutionalizing ADR: Competing Values Commentary on 'Pursuing Settlement in An Adversary Culture: A Tale of Innovation Co-opted or 'The Law of ADR'" 19 Fla. St. L. Rev. 1-46 (1991)

Chapter in: Discussions on Dispute Resolution, Sara Cole, Art Hinshaw and Andrea Kupfer Schneider, editors, Forthcoming

UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2018-60

8 Pages Posted: 1 Nov 2018

See all articles by Carrie Menkel-Meadow

Carrie Menkel-Meadow

University of California, Irvine School of Law; Georgetown University Law Center

Date Written: October 31, 2018

Abstract

This is the unedited version of a short chapter in the edited collection Discussions in Dispute Resolution, which offers commentaries on the leading foundational articles in the field of Dispute Resolution or “ADR.” This essay responds to commentaries written on Carrie Menkel-Meadow’s “Pursuing Settlement in An Adversary Culture: The Co-optation of Innovation or the Law of ADR,” (1991) and discusses the problems and issues with the institutionalization of various forms of ADR in courts and contracts (e.g. mandatory arbitration). The essay frames ongoing concerns about the co-optation of foundational “problem solving” and “alternative” conceptions of dispute resolution as processes are reified, rigidified, removed from their “voluntary” commitments, and otherwise distorted, in part by being legalized and legitimized through court decisions and routinization in some dispute system designs, without sufficient attention to the original conceptions of tailored outcomes and party participation and choice. The essay concludes with a small note of optimism signaling what contributions increased attention to ADR has made on legal and cultural developments in dispute resolution, both domestically and comparatively.

Keywords: dispute resolution

Suggested Citation

Menkel-Meadow, Carrie J., Institutionalizing ADR: Competing Values Commentary on 'Pursuing Settlement in An Adversary Culture: A Tale of Innovation Co-opted or 'The Law of ADR'" 19 Fla. St. L. Rev. 1-46 (1991) (October 31, 2018). Chapter in: Discussions on Dispute Resolution, Sara Cole, Art Hinshaw and Andrea Kupfer Schneider, editors, Forthcoming; UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2018-60. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3276374

Carrie J. Menkel-Meadow (Contact Author)

University of California, Irvine School of Law ( email )

401 E. Peltason Drive
Irvine, CA 92697-1000
United States
949-824-1987 (Phone)

Georgetown University Law Center ( email )

600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
202-662-9379 (Phone)
202-662-9412 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
23
Abstract Views
245
PlumX Metrics